Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparison of the effect of lps and pam3 on ventilated lungs

Original Submission
21 Jul 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Sep 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Graeme Zosky
23 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rosalinda Sorrentino
23 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Hans-Peter Hauber
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Graeme Zosky
13 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rosalinda Sorrentino
22 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Hans-Peter Hauber
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Hans-Peter Hauber
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
14 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Hans-Peter Hauber
Resubmission - Version 6
14 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
20 Apr 2010 Editorially accepted
20 Apr 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2466-10-20

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page