Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Table 3 PEEP value in ARDS/hARF studies

From: Electrical impedance tomography guided positive end-expiratory pressure titration in critically ill and surgical adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Study Design

EIT Group

Control Group

p-value

PEEP Strategy

Optimal PEEP (mmHg)

PEEP Strategy

Optimal PEEP (mmHg)

Jimenez et al. [12]

RCT

CL/OD

14 ± 2.83

high PEEP- FiO2 table

15.17 ± 3.24

0.067

Hsu et al. [13]

RCT

CL/OD

16.2 ± 2.6

Pressure–volume loop

17.4 ± 1.7

0.02*

He et al. [9]

RCT

CL/OD

8 ± 5.86

low PEEP- FiO2 table

7 ± 5.60

NR

Scaramuzzo et al. [14]

RCT

SStot

14.8 ± 8.97

PL/FiO2 table

13.2 ± 5.66

0.60

Zhao et al. [15]

historical control study

CL/OD

17.6 ± 3.6

Pressure–volume loop

13.6 ± 3.6

 < 0.01*

  1. *EIT group versus control group, p < 0.05. PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure, CL/OD collapse and overdistension percentage, SStot total silent spaces, FiO2 fraction of inspired oxygen, PL transpulmonary pressure
Back to article page

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

ISSN: 1471-2466

Contact us