Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups

From: Effect of home noninvasive positive pressure ventilation combined with pulmonary rehabilitation on dyspnea severity and quality of life in patients with severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease combined with chronic type II respiratory failure: a randomized controlled trial

 

Group

 
 

CTG (n = 137)

CPRNG (n = 132)

P

Age group

 40–49 years

7(5.11%)

4(3.03%)

0.58

 50–59 years

37(27.01%)

36(27.28%)

1

 60–69 years

45(32.85%)

42(31.82%)

0.96

 70 years and older

48(35.04%)

50(37.88%)

0.72

Gender

 Female

39(28.47%)

37(28.03%)

1

 Male

98(71.53%)

95(71.98%)

1

Time since diagnosis

 1–4 years

53(38.69%)

45(32.85%)

0.51

 5–9 years

39(28.47%)

42(31.82%)

0.64

 10 years + 

45(32.85%)

45(32.85%)

0.93

Smoking status

 Smoker

17(12.41%)

17(12.88%)

1

 Ex-smoker

104(75.91%)

102(77.27%)

0.9

 Non-smoker

16(11.68%)

17(12.88%)

0.9

Alcohol drinking status

 Ex-drinker

78(56.93%)

80(60.60%)

0.62

 Non-drinker

59(43.07%)

52(39.40%)

1

The most common problems

 Shortness of breath

69(50.36%)

66(50.00%)

1

 Cough

45(32.85%)

43(32.58%)

1

 Phlegm

39(28.47%)

37(28.03%)

1

 Fatigue

49(35.78%)

45(32.85%)

0.87

 Insomnia

28(20.44%)

26(19.70%)

1

 Wheezing

17(12.41%)

17(12.88%)

1

 Sweating

7(5.11%)

8(6.06%)

0.94

Pharmacological Treatment

 LAMA (%)

118 (86.1%)

116 (87.9%)

0.68

 LABA (%)

105 (76.6%)

103 (78.0%)

0.78

 ICS (%)

92 (67.2%)

91 (68.9%)

0.75

 LAMA + LABA (%)

97 (70.8%)

95 (72.0%)

0.82

 LAMA + ICS (%)

85 (62.0%)

83 (62.9%)

0.91

 LABA + ICS (%)

80 (58.4%)

79 (59.8%)

0.84

 LAMA + LABA + ICS (%)

74 (54.0%)

72 (54.5%)

0.94

  1. CTG Conventional Treatment Group, CPRNG Home-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation Combined Group, LAMA Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists, LABA Long-Acting Beta- 2 Agonists, ICS Inhaled Corticosteroids