Skip to main content

Unveiling the psychosocial impact of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor therapy in Cystic Fibrosis patients

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to assess how Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor (ETI) influences lung function, Body Mass Index (BMI), Sweat Test (ST) and mental health of Cystic Fibrosis (CF) patients, emphasizing on depression and anxiety.

Methods

We conducted an observational, prospective, multicentre study including 108 patients over 18 years old who initiated ETI therapy between December 2019 and December 2023. Patients underwent regular evaluations, including clinical, functional, and microbiological assessments, alongside completion of quality of life, anxiety, and depression questionnaires. We evaluated whether there was a difference in anxiety and depression levels over time.

Results

After 12 months of treatment, significant improvements were noted in BMI, lung function (FEV1%), ST and various aspects of quality of life (CFQ-R). However, anxiety and depression levels did not differ significantly during the follow-up. When we stratified our sample by key groups, we observed that younger patients (under 28 years) and those with homozygous Phe508del mutations experienced significant higher anxiety with no differences on depression. Furthermore, anxiety and depression demonstrated a moderate correlation, strengthening over time.

Conclusions

Treatment with ETI establishes significant improvements in lung function, BMI, ST and quality of life in patients with CF. However, despite these positive outcomes, there were no significant changes observed in levels of anxiety and depression, except for individuals with homozygous mutation type and those younger than 28 years old, who exhibited significant higher levels of anxiety.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disease with multiorgan involvement based on dysfunction or absence of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, which constitutes a chloride channel in the secretory epithelial cells of the digestive and respiratory system, sweat glands, and genital system [1]. Patients with CF have traditionally been complex cases, with progressive decline in lung function, frequent exacerbations, microbiological isolates, usual pancreatic involvement, and repeated hospitalizations with a very limited life expectancy. Since the advent of highly effective modulator therapy (HEMT) with Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor (ETI), the paradigm of the disease has undergone an unprecedented shift, with clear improvements already observed in lung function, body mass index (BMI), exacerbations, microbiological isolates, and ultimately, quality of life [2].

However, the impact of CF doesn’t just affect individuals on a physical level; it also profoundly impacts mental health as patients grappling with CF often find themselves contending with high levels of depression and anxiety. This psychological toll underscores the complex nature of CF, highlighting the need for comprehensive support systems and interventions that address both the physical and mental well-being of those affected. Consequently, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and the International Committee on Mental Health in Cystic Fibrosis recommend annual depression and anxiety screenings using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7) [3].

The observational and experimental studies conducted to date with ETI have focused on evaluating objective data such as forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), BMI, exacerbations, and microbiological isolations, yielding very positive results [4,5,6]. However, they have not yet included outcomes pertaining to the psychosocial sphere of the patients, as the concepts of “anxiety” and “depression” are not encompassed in the pivotal clinical trials of the drug. Therefore, despite the previously mentioned benefits of ETI, the evolution of the mental health of patients with CF is still an enigma.

Since the approval of CFTR modulators in the United States in 2019, case series have emerged, indicating a concerning trend: some patients may experience deteriorating mood, sleep problems, anxiety, and an uptick in suicide attempts upon commencing treatment with ETI [7,8,9,10,11]. This revelation adds a layer of complexity to the management of CF, urging healthcare providers to remain vigilant and proactive in monitoring and addressing not only the physical symptoms but also the mental health aspects of CF treatment.

Considering these findings, a critical update has been incorporated into the technical information for ETI. The addition includes a crucial warning: “Depression (including suicidal ideation and suicide attempts) has been reported in patients treated with ETI, which typically occurs within three months of starting treatment and in patients with a history of psychiatric disorders. In some cases, symptom improvement was reported after dose reduction or discontinuation of treatment. Patients (and their caregivers) should be advised to monitor for the onset of depressive moods, suicidal thoughts, or unusual changes in behaviour, and to seek immediate medical attention if these symptoms occur”. This vital precaution highlights the importance of proactive patient monitoring and the urgent need for swift medical intervention in cases where mental health concerns arise during ETI treatment.

In contrast, there are other studies indicating psychological improvements after initiating ETI. For instance, a study by Martin et al.. demonstrated how patients with CF experienced enhancements in physical, psychological, and social aspects after starting the new treatment. This led to a higher quality of life and the development of new personal aspirations [12].

As we navigate this new chapter in CF care, it’s necessary to prioritize comprehensive patient support and foster open dialogue to mitigate potential risks and optimize outcomes. Given the complexities outlined above, it becomes evident that additional research is warranted to comprehensively understand the psychosocial impacts accompanying the initiation of ETI. Our study aimed to provide valuable insights into how ETI influences both mental health and associated physiological parameters, thus guiding future therapeutic strategies, and optimizing patient care.

Materials and methods

We conducted an observational, prospective, multicentre study. We included as a selection criterion, patients over 18 years of age who were regularly followed up in the clinic and had started ETI between December 2019 and December 2023. In total, our study comprised 108 patients (Fig. 1) from two CF units in the country: La Princesa University Hospital (74 patients) and Central University Hospital of Asturias (34 patients).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of recruited patients with CF. CFQ-R: Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised, GAD-7: Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 Items, PHQ-9: Patient Health Questionnaire-9. HULP: La Princesa University Hospital, HUCA: Central University Hospital of Asturias

The study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee (CEIm) of both hospitals (CEIm Ref No 957/2020 and 067/2020), and informed consent was obtained from all included patients to participate in this study.

The patients were seen in the specific CF clinic every 3 months, being evaluated from a clinical, functional, and microbiological perspective at each visit.

For each patient, demographic (date of birth, sex, age at the beginning of the treatment and race) and anthropometric (height, weight and BMI) data was collected. We also obtained the sweat test results of patients from one of the two units included in the study, both before and after the start of ETI (the brand name of the equipment was Macroduct Advanced, Bigen Diagnostica SL). Genetic analysis was performed upon diagnosis of the disease, initially by analysis of frequent pathogenic variants (specific kits, including poli-T and poli-TG). In cases where none of these variants were found, gene sequencing of CFTR was done.

To monitor pulmonary function, we used basic spirometry in all visits, obtaining FVC, FEV1 and FEV1/FVC ratio, comparing the results with the reference values for the same weight, height, age, sex and race (Spirometer brands: ELITE SERIES TM, Medgraphics and CPFS/D USB™ Spirometer - MGC Diagnostics). From a microbiological point of view, sputum cultures for bacterial, mycobacterial and fungi were collected and analysed prior to each visit, counting as an exacerbation any episode of worsening of the basal state that from medical criteria, required antibiotherapy, whether oral or intravenous, and distinguishing between those that required hospitalization for more than 24 h and those that did not.

Additionally, the specific Cystic Fibrosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (CFQR) scores for respiratory, digestive, physical activity, role, eating disturbances, treatment, vitality, and emotional aspects were collected both before and after starting treatment, also every 3 months. Each section can reach a maximum score of 100 points, indicating better quality of life [13].

The assessment of patients’ psychomorbidity was conducted by reviewing scores from the PHQ-9 (a 9-item depression questionnaire with scores ranging from 0 to 27) and GAD-7 (a 7-item anxiety questionnaire with scores ranging from 0 to 21) [14, 15].

Depression severity was classified as normal/minimal, moderate, moderately severe, or severe based on PHQ-9 scores (0–4, 10–14, 15–19, ≥ 20, respectively), while anxiety severity was categorized as normal/minimal, mild, moderate, moderately severe, or severe, corresponding to GAD-7 scores (0–4, 5–9, 10–14, and ≥ 15, respectively).

As a general vision, for any of the two questionnaires, a score below 5 points was considered “No depression/anxiety,” while a score of 5 points or higher was considered “Depression/anxiety”. Taking this into account, for each condition (depression or anxiety), patients were grouped into four categories based on changes between pre- and post-ETI (0 and 12 months respectively): Group 1 (no depression/anxiety), Group 2 (newly developed depression/anxiety), Group 3 (improved depression/anxiety), and Group 4 (persistent depression/anxiety), as shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Distribution of patients into four distinct groups based on their PHQ-9/GAD-7 scores at baseline and final study time

Regarding the statistics, a preliminary descriptive analysis of patient characteristics was conducted by computing measures of central tendency and dispersion for quantitative variables and counts and percentages for qualitative variables. The normality and homoscedasticity of continuous variables were assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests, and Levene’s test, respectively. Parametric tests were employed when data distributions were both normal and homoscedastic, while non-parametric tests were utilized when these assumptions were not met. For qualitative variables, comparisons of proportions were assessed using either the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Median differences were conducted and their Confidence Intervals (CI) using a bootstrap of 9999 replicates. For the cut-off points for FEV1 and age, the median for both values in our sample was used. Inter-rater agreement to measure outcomes was assessed using intraclass correlation (ICC) analysis. In any comparison, a value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All data management, statistical computations, and graphical representations were carried out using the R statistical software.

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics before starting HEMT

The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of 108 CF patients are shown in Table 1. The median age was 30.0 years [17.0–60.0], with a slight predominance of males (54.6%). Regarding pancreatic involvement, 84.3% had exocrine pancreas issues, while 41.7% exhibited endocrine pancreas complications. Hepatopathy was observed in 24.1% of the total cohort. In terms of infections, the most presented microorganism was Methicillin-sensible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (58.3%) followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (36.1%). Notably, non-invasive mechanical ventilation was not required by any participant, and only a small percentage (6.5%) received oxygen therapy. The utilization of treatments revealed that 42.6% of the total cohort had received a previous modulator, being Tezacaftor and Ivacaftor the most common, administered to 89.1% of them. Side effects were generally low (5.6%). Regarding transplant-related outcomes, only a small percentage of the population was on the transplant active list (1.9%) although a slightly bigger group (5.6%) had been evaluated by the transplant unit team. No participants were reported as deceased during the study period.

Table 1 Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of CF patients at the beginning of the treatment

Depression, anxiety and quality of life

The difference in medians for the variables were conducted comparing baseline with the results at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from the start of ETI (Table 2). Improvement for BMI, FEV1%, and the respiratory, role, and emotional domains of CFQ-R began to be visible and statistically significant as early as the first 3 months after the initiation of treatment, an improvement that also remained statistically significant after completing one year of treatment. For the digestive, vitality, and eating domains of CFQ-R, significant improvement was observed at 12 months, with this difference not being statistically significant earlier. In the case of the PHQ-9 questionnaire for depression, a punctually significant improvement was observed at 9 months. For the treatment domain of the CFQ-R and the GAD-7 questionnaire for anxiety, no significant difference in medians was observed during the whole year of follow-up.

Table 2 Effects of ETI on quality of life determined by the CFQ-R

We conducted median differences between the 12-month treatment period and baseline scores for the respiratory domain of the CFQR, as well as the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 questionnaires (Table 3; Fig. 3). This analysis was stratified by key factors such as sex, mutations, age (greater or less than the median age value), FEV1 status (greater or less than the median FEV1 value), and the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Significant differences in median scores were found across all subgroups when comparing the baseline CFQ-R respiratory domain scores with those after 1 year of treatment. Conversely, no significant differences were detected within any subgroup for the GAD-7 scores although PHQ-9 questionnaire showed a significant difference in median differences among Phe508del homozygotes and individuals younger than 28 years old.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Evolution of the variables FEV1%, BMI, and sweat test at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after starting HEMT. * The sweat test was only performed on the 34 patients from HUCA

Table 3 Assessment of ETI effects on CFQ-R respiratory domain, PHQ-9 and GAD-7, stratifying by key factors

Changes in depression based on PHQ-9 questionnaire

Prior to the initiation of ETI, our analysis revealed that out of 106 patients, the majority (63.2%), reported either no or minimal depression (scored 0–4 points). Mild depression (scored 5–9 points) was reported by 23.6% (25 patients) of patients, while 11.3% (12 patients) reported moderate depression (scored 10–14 points). The incidence of moderate-severe depression (scored 15–19 points) was minimal, with only 0.9% (1 patients) of patients affected, along with 0.9% reporting severe depression characterised by a questionnaire score exceeding 20 (Table 1).

After 12 months of therapy, 13 patients were lost to follow-up. Upon analysing the questionnaires collected from the remaining 93 patients, a slight increase in the percentage of patients without depression was observed, rising to 66.7% (62 patients). Additionally, the proportion of patients reporting mild depression slightly increased to 24.7% (23 patients). Notably, the percentage of patients reporting moderate depression rose to 7.5% (7 patients), while severe depression remained limited to 1.1%, affecting a single patient (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Paired assessment for effects of ETI on CFQ-R domains and PHQ-9 in total and depending on sex, age, mutation, lung function, presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (including only groups that showed unless one significant difference between groups)

Baseline characteristics of the groups were analysed in relation to the development of depression assessed by the PHQ-9 questionnaire over the course of the study as shown in Fig. 2. A notable observation was the predominance of females in Group 2, the cohort that developed depression. Additionally, the median age at the start of ETI for Group 3, the cohort that transitioned to no depression, was 24.5 years, slightly lower than the other groups. In terms of pulmonary function, groups 3 and 4 exhibited slightly depressed baseline FEV1% with medians of 58% and 54% respectively, indicating potential respiratory impairment in these groups (Table 5 in Appendix). Regarding microbiological isolations, 58.3% of patients in Group 2 had chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. However, none of these observed differences reached statistical significance.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Alluvial plot depicting the distribution of patients during the follow-up of ETI therapy of the categories for Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (A) and Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD7) (B)

Changes in anxiety, based on GAD-7 questionnaire

When we examined the anxiety levels of our patients prior to initiating ETI therapy (106 individuals), we found that the majority experienced either no anxiety or minimal anxiety (scored 0–4 points), with 63.2% of our sample (67 patients) falling into this category. Mild anxiety (scored 5–9 points) was reported by 25.5% (27 patients), while 6.6% (7 patients) reported moderate anxiety (scored 10–14 points), and only 5 patients (4.7%) reported severe anxiety, scoring above 15 on the questionnaire (Table 1).

Following 12 months of initiating modulatory therapy, 15 patients were lost to follow-up, leaving 91 participants who completed the GAD-7 questionnaire. Updated assessments indicated a decrease in individuals reporting no or minimal anxiety to 55 patients (60.4%) and a reduction in those experiencing severe anxiety to 3 patients (3.3%). The proportion of patients with mild anxiety remained consistent, with 23 individuals (25.3%) falling within this category. Notably, the number of patients exhibiting moderate anxiety increased to 10 (11%) (Fig. 5).

Baseline characteristics of the groups were analysed in relation to the development of anxiety assessed by the GAD-7 questionnaire over the course of the study as shown in Fig. 2. We observe a predominance of males (67.4%) in Group 1 (those who never had anxiety) with a predominance of females in the remaining groups. Regarding BMI, a higher index (23.2) is observed for Group 2 (those who did not have anxiety and developed it). In terms of respiratory function, no significant differences are observed, with similar mean FEV1% across all 4 groups (Table 6 in Appendix). None of the observed differences reached statistical significance.

Evolution of pulmonary function between depression and anxiety along the study

Taking into account the established groups for PHQ-9 and GAD-7 (Fig. 2), the evolution of lung function measured in FEV1% was studied and depicted for each cohort in Fig. 6.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Evolution of FEV1 at baseline and 12 months post-treatment for the different groups according to the GAD-7 and PHQ-9 groups

Regarding the GAD-7 anxiety questionnaire, Group 2 displayed diminished FEV1% in comparison to the other cohorts, corresponding to individuals who developed anxiety after treatment initiation. Nonetheless, no statistically significant differences were discerned.

As for the PHQ-9 questionnaire, diminished FEV1% was noted in Groups 2 and 4, denoting impaired pulmonary function in both those who experienced depression throughout the study period and those who developed it following the commencement of ETI. These results, while clinically meaningful, did not reach statistical significance.

Correlation between anxiety and depression

The inter-agreement between anxiety and depression, in total and for each time point of the study, was measured through the analysis of Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) (Table 4). The findings reveal a significant correlation between anxiety and depression throughout the study, with an overall ICC of 0.560 (p < 0.001), classified as moderate. Additionally, a trend of increasing correlation over time is observed, from a discrete correlation at 0 months (ICC = 0.370) to a substantial correlation at 6 months (ICC = 0.761). However, from 9 months onwards, this correlation remains moderate.

Table 4 Correlation between anxiety and depression throughout study

Discussion

CF remains a complex and challenging disease to manage, requiring a multidimensional approach to treatment. Emerging therapies targeting the CFTR protein have raised hopes for improved outcomes in CF patients, but the evidence on mental health is still inconclusive. Our study, involving a relevant sample of CF patients over a one-year period, did not show statistically significant differences in the evolution of anxiety and depression levels following the start of therapy, although we did observe a significant correlation between both mental health conditions. This finding aligns with prior research [16,17,18,19], showing statistically significant improvements in lung function and quality of life as measured by the CFQ-R questionnaire, but inconclusive results in mental health outcomes.

Our results are consistent with the current literature, including the studies by Zhang et al. and Pudukodu et al., which also did not observe significant changes in anxiety and depression scores after initiating ETI therapy [20, 21]. Additionally, a comprehensive review from the University Of Washington School Of Medicine concluded that changes in depression may be more attributable to patients’ baseline characteristics rather than a direct effect of ETI [22].

However, our findings contrasts with other results, such as the ones revealed by Evelyne et al., who documented new neuropsychiatric symptoms in a subset of patients who started ETI, including cognitive disorders, insomnia, depression, anxiety, lack of energy, mania and hypomania [23]. On the other side, an Italian study, that analysed the psychiatric behaviour of 92 patients during the first 6 months after starting ETI, found improvements in depression during the first month post-therapy, but no change in anxiety levels [24]. These discrepancies highlight the complexity of evaluating mental health outcomes in CF patients and suggest that a range of external factors may influence results.

Although no statistically significant results were found concerning mental health in our study, we revealed a slight decrease on the prevalence of depression and a mild uptick in the percentage of patients who exhibited anxiety during the 12 months of follow-up. This findings highlight the dynamic nature of mental health in CF patients, probably related to new treatment routines, new expectations, or weight gain, as eating disorders are another major obstacle in CF patients [25, 26].

In a subgroup analysis, we found that younger patients (< 28 years) experienced higher levels of anxiety, possibly due to developmental factors or less effective coping mechanisms. Additionally, patients with a homozygous Phe508del mutation also exhibited greater anxiety, likely related to concerns about disease severity, prognosis, and the impact of treatment on daily life [27]. In contrast, depression scores did not show significant variation across demographic groups. These findings emphasize the importance of personalized psychological support for CF patients, tailored to their age and genetic background.

It is pertinent to highlight the potential relation between the occurrence of anxiety and a rise in patients’ BMI after the commencement of ETI (Anex 2) [28]. This association may be related to changes in body perception, as CF patients are often accustomed to maintaining lower weights despite high caloric intake. The notable rise in BMI following treatment initiation could potentially trigger higher anxiety levels, influenced by concerns about body image or the psychological impact of weight gain [29,30,31]. Further research is imperative to determine whether this relationship is causal or consequential. Specifically, future studies should explore how body image perception and associated psychological factors evolve over time in CF patients receiving ETI, and whether tailored support can mitigate these anxiety responses.

Despite these insights, our study is limited by the lack of formal psychological assessments and the absence of baseline psychiatric medication data. Additionally, the mental health outcomes did not correlate with clinical factors like exacerbations, hospitalizations, or treatment complexity. Nevertheless, our study stands out for its large sample size, long follow-up, and subgroup analyses, contributing valuable information to the limited literature on the mental health impact of ETI therapy.

CFTR modulator therapy holds promise for physiological improvements in CF patients but its impact on mental health remains a subject of ongoing investigation. Our study contributes to this discourse by highlighting the complexities and challenges of assessing mental health outcomes in the context of CFTR modulator therapy. Further research is needed to unravel the complex link between CFTR modulators and mental well-being.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated physiological benefits of triple therapy, including improved pulmonary function, BMI, and quality of life. However, the impact on mental health remains complex, and future research should focus on longitudinal, multidimensional analyses to better understand and address the psychosocial needs of CF patients. Holistic care models that integrate mental health assessments and support may optimize overall patient well-being.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

Marta Solís García:

M. Solís García

Adrián Peláez :

A. Peláez

Rosa Mar Gómez Punter :

R.M. Gómez Punter

María Criado López :

M. Criado López

Claudia Madrid Carbajal :

C. Madrid-Carbajal

Julio Ancochea :

J. Ancochea

Jose María Eiros Bachiller :

J.M. Eiros Bachiller

Ana Sofía Martín Hernández :

A.S. Martín-Hernández

María Rodrigo-García:

M. Rodrigo-García

Marta García Clemente :

M. García-Clemente

Rosa Mª Girón Moreno :

R.M. Girón Moreno

References

  1. Talwalkar JS, Koff JL, Lee HB, et al. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator modulators: implications for the management of depression and anxiety in cystic fibrosis. Psychosomatics. 2017;58:343–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kapouni N, Moustaki M, Douros K, Loukou I. Efficacy and safety of Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor in the treatment of cystic fibrosis: a systematic review. Child (Basel). 2023;10(3):554. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/children10030554. PMID: 36980112; PMCID: PMC10047761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Quittner AL, Abbott J, Georgiopoulos AM, et al. International committee on mental health in cystic fibrosis: cystic fibrosis foundation and European cystic fibrosis society consensus statements for screening and treating depression and anxiety. Thorax. 2016;71:26–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Heijerman HG, McKone EF, Downey DG, Van Braeckel E, Rowe SM, Tullis E, et al. Efficacy and safety of the elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor combination regimen in people with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the F508del mutation: a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial. The Lancet. 2019;23(394(10212)):1940–8.

  5. Burgel PR, Durieu I, Chiron R, Ramel S, Danner-Boucher I, Prevotat A, et al. French cystic fibrosis reference network study group. Rapid improvement after starting elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor in patients with cystic fibrosis and advanced pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021;(204):64–73.

  6. Carrasco Hernández L, Girón Moreno RM, Balaguer Cartagena MN, Peláez A, Sole A, Álvarez Fernández A, et al. Experience with Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in patients with cystic fibrosis and advanced disease. Arch Bronconeumol. 2023;59(9):556–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McKinzie CJ, Goralski JL, Noah TL, et al. Worsening anxiety and depression after initiation of lumacaftor/ivacaftor combination therapy in adolescent females with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2017;16:525–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cabrini G, Rimessi A, Borgatti M, Pinton P, Gambari R. Overview of CF lung pathophysiology. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2022;64: 102214. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.coph.2022.102214. Epub 2022 Apr 19. PMID: 35453033.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Quintana-Gallego E. Editorial fibrosis quística: asociación entre depresión, ansiedad y calidad de vida relacionada con la salud. 2012.

  10. Quintana-Gallego E, Delgado-Pecellín I, Calero Acuña C. Tratamientos reparadores de la proteína CFTR en la fibrosis quística. Arch Bronconeumol. 2014;50(4):146–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bathgate CJ, Muther E, Georgiopoulos AM, Smith B, Tillman L, Graziano S, Verkleij M, Lomas P, Quittner A. Positive and negative impacts of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor: Healthcare providers’ observations across US centers. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2023;58(9):2469–77 Epub 2023 Jun 2. PMID: 37265418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin C, Burnet E, Ronayette-Preira A, de Carli P, Martin J, Delmas L, et al. Patient perspectives following initiation of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor in people with cystic fibrosis and advanced lung disease. Respir Med Res. 2021;80:100829.

  13. Olveira G, Olveira C, Gaspar I, Cruz I, Dorado A, Pérez-Ruiz E, et al. Validación De La versión española del cuestionario revisado de calidad de vida para fibrosis quística en adolescentes y adultos (CFQR 14 + Spain). Arch Bronconeumol. 2010;46(4):165–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Patient Health Questionnaire Study Group. Validity and utility of a self-report version of PRIMEMD: the PHQ Primary Care Study. JAMA. 1999;282:1737–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Heijerman HGM, McKone EF, Downey DG, Van Braeckel E, Rowe SM, Tullis E, Mall MA, Welter JJ, Ramsey BW, McKee CM, Marigowda G, Moskowitz SM, Waltz D, Sosnay PR, Simard C, Ahluwalia N, Xuan F, Zhang Y, Taylor-Cousar JL, McCoy KS; VX17-445-103 Trial Group. Efficacy and safety of the elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor combination regimen in people with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the F508del mutation: a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10212):1940–1948. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32597-8. Epub 2019 Oct 31. Erratum in: Lancet. 2020;395(10238):1694. PMID: 31679946; PMCID: PMC7571408.

  17. Sutharsan S, Dillenhoefer S, Welsner M, Stehling F, Brinkmann F, Burkhart M, Ellemunter H, Dittrich AM, Smaczny C, Eickmeier O, Kappler M, Schwarz C, Sieber S, Naehrig S, Naehrlich L, German. Impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on lung function, nutritional status, pulmonary exacerbation frequency and sweat chloride in people with cystic fibrosis: real-world evidence from the German CF Registry. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023;32:100690. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100690. PMID: 37554663; PMCID: PMC10405057. CF Registry of the Mukoviszidose e.V. and participating CF sites.

  18. Bower JK, Volkova N, Ahluwalia N, Sahota G, Xuan F, Chin A, Weinstock TG, Ostrenga J, Elbert A. Real-world safety and effectiveness of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in people with cystic fibrosis: interim results of a long-term registry-based study. J Cyst Fibros. 2023;22(4):730–7 Epub 2023 Mar 22. PMID: 36963986.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Regard L, Martin C, Burnet E, Da Silva J, Burgel PR. CFTR modulators in people with cystic fibrosis: real-world evidence in France. Cells. 2022;11(11):1769. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/cells11111769. PMID: 35681464; PMCID: PMC9179538.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang L, Albon D, Jones M, Bruschwein H. Impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on depression and anxiety in cystic fibrosis. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2022;16:17534666221144212. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1177/17534666221144211. PMID: 36562554; PMCID: PMC9793010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Pudukodu H, Powell MZ, Ceppe A, Donaldson SH, Goralski JL, Sowa NA. Analysis of depression and anxiety scores following initiation of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in adults with cystic fibrosis. Clin Respir J. 2024;18(9):e70007. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/crj.70007. PMID: 39210645; PMCID: PMC11362501.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ramsey B, Correll CU, DeMaso DR, McKone E, Tullis E, Taylor-Cousar JL, Chu C, Volkova N, Ahluwalia N, Waltz D, Tian S, Mall MA. Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor treatment and depression-related events. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024;209(3):299–306. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1164/rccm.202308-1525OC. PMID: 37890129; PMCID: PMC10840763.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baroud E, Chaudhary N, Georgiopoulos AM. Management of neuropsychiatric symptoms in adults treated with elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2023;58(7):1920–30. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/ppul.26412. Epub 2023 Apr 10. PMID: 37036050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Graziano S, Ullmann N, Rusciano R, Allegorico A, Boldrini F, Rosito L, Quittner AL, Cutrera R, Tabarini P. Comparison of mental health in individuals with primary ciliary dyskinesia, cystic fibrosis, and parent caregivers. Respir Med. 2023;207: 107095 Epub 2022 Dec 23. PMID: 36572068.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Darukhanavala A, Merjaneh L, Mason K, Le T. Eating disorders and body image in cystic fibrosis. J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2021;26: 100280. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jcte.2021.100280. PMID: 34917482; PMCID: PMC8646158.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Barrett J, Slatter G, Whitehouse JL, Nash EF. Perception, experience and relationship with food and eating in adults with cystic fibrosis. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2022;35(5):757–64. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/jhn.12967. Epub 2021 Dec 16. PMID: 34914145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Johansen HK, Nir M, Høiby N, Koch C, Schwartz M. Severity of cystic fibrosis in patients homozygous and heterozygous for delta F508 mutation. Lancet. 1991;337(8742):631–4. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/0140-6736(91)92449-c. PMID: 1671990.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Solís-García M, García-Clemente MM, Madrid-Carbajal CJ, et al. Is obesity a problem in new cystic fibrosis treatments? Nutrients. 2024;16(18):3103. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/nu16183103. Published 2024 Sep 14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Petersen MC, Begnel L, Wallendorf M, Litvin M. Effect of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor on body weight and metabolic parameters in adults with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2022;21(2):265–71. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jcf.2021.11.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fajac I, Daines C, Durieu I, Goralski JL, Heijerman H, Knoop C, Majoor C, Bruinsma BG, Moskowitz S, Prieto-Centurion V, Van Brunt K, Zhang Y, Quittner A. Non-respiratory health-related quality of life in people with cystic fibrosis receiving elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor. J Cyst Fibros. 2023;22(1):119–23 Epub 2022 Sep 14. PMID: 36114142.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Proud D, Duckers J. Weight a minute: exploring the effect on weight and body composition after the initiation of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in adults with CF. J Cyst Fibros. 2023;22(5):847–50. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jcf.2023.06.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Neumomadrid for supporting this study with a grant.

Clinical trial number

This research is not a clinical trial; therefore we cannot provide a clinical trial number.

Funding

This project has received a grant from Neumomadrid.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M. Solís García, R.M. Gómez Punter, M. García Clemente, R.M. Girón Moreno A. Peláez. wrote the main manuscript text and M. Solís García. A. Peláez. prepared Figs. 1, 2, and 3. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrián Peláez.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of both hospitals (CEIm Ref No 957/2020 and 067/2020)” for studies involving humans, and informed consent was obtained every human participant in this study. The informed consent was included in supplementary data.

Consent for publication

This manuscript does not contain any individual data, therefore consent for publication is “Not applicable”.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5 Comparison of groups according to depression score between baseline and 12 months post-treatment
Table 6 Group comparison according to anxiety score between baseline and 12 months post-treatment

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

García, M.S., Peláez, A., Punter, R.M.G. et al. Unveiling the psychosocial impact of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor therapy in Cystic Fibrosis patients. BMC Pulm Med 25, 81 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12890-024-03455-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12890-024-03455-2

Keywords